Please note I got the title of this post from Sassy. I know we've used this picture of Mayim Bialik wearing the American flag as a hat on this blog before, but it seems appropriate for this particular moment.
Have other people been able to get any work done? I am finding it nearly impossible these days, since all I really want to do is read every single word written about the presidential race, particularly if it has to do with Obama and/or Hillary. I was particularly mesmerized by Andrew Sullivan's piece on why Obama is right right now in The Atlantic. And on Salon, I thought Rebecca Traister perfectly captured why even women who aren't necessarily Hillary supporters are appalled by all of the anti-woman flogging she's been getting.
Speaking of. In today's Times, tucked between Caitlin Flanagan's rumination on teen sex (lucky us!) and Nora Ephron on, um, chicken soup, was what I think might be the most egregious condemnation of Hillary yet. I'm sure there have been worse, but I just didn't expect this piece from Lorrie Moore, which argues that we shouldn't vote for Hillary just because she is a woman, because today's girls don't need her as a role model anyway.
She says:
"In my opinion, it is a little late in the day to become sentimental about a woman running for president. The political moment for feminine role models, arguably, has passed us by. The children who are suffering in this country, who are having trouble in school, and for whom the murder and suicide rates and economic dropout rates are high, are boys — especially boys of color, for whom the whole educational system, starting in kindergarten, often feels a form of exile, a system designed by and for white girls."
Wow. It is, of course, unavoidably true that boys of color are in a very special kind of crisis. It is a real problem and one we need to do something about. There have been plenty of articles about this. (I wrote one about the so-called "boy crisis" for Teen Vogue about a year ago.) But the system feels like it was designed by and for white girls? Sorry, no, it wasn't and isn't. The educational system was designed by and for white boys, and hasn't really changed all that much. Yes, it's true that white, middle-class girls are now doing really well in high school and in college. Certain forms of sexism are now delayed until women become mothers. Regardless, the idea that we should vote for Obama because he is black and racial problems haven't been solved and we shouldn't vote for Hillary because, as Moore says, "The time to capture the imagination of middle-class white girls, the group Hillary Clinton represents, was long ago. Such girls have now managed on their own (given that in this economy only the rich are doing well)" strikes me as truly despicable. And mean.
I'm not saying I advocate voting for Hillary. But I don't advocate NOT voting for her because middle-class white girls have been doing pretty well for themselves over the last few years.
I am re-reading it now and it just gets worse and worse.
"Boys are faring worse — and the time for symbols and leaders they can connect with beneficially should be now and should be theirs."
and
"But inspiration is essential for living, and Mr. Obama holds the greater fascination for our children."
WHAT?
Anyway, all of the generational conflict is at least as interesting as the gender and race conflict. Gail Collins asked "How could you be 21 and not be for Barack Obama? How could you be 53 and not wonder how this relative stranger will hold up when the disasters arrive, when things get truly nasty and the crowd starts seeing him as mortal?" (What does that mean for those of us who are 32? Why is it always Boomer vs. Y?) But some people have it figured out. Here is the inimitable Julianne Shepherd (a Sassy fan. See her post "feminists for Obama"). Jeff Chang's take on Iowa and New Hampshire and generational conflict is excellent. He says, the day after NH, "I was stunned this morning to see a new level of unseemly Boomer crowing, as if a Clinton victory is a much-needed beatdown of post-Boomers and the MSM who allegedly love them." I point this out because I thoroughly enjoyed the phrase "unseemly boomer crowing." And agree with the sentiment.
Okay, now I really do need to do some work.
