The Washington Post, The New York Sun, and The Daily Oklahoman have signed on with online news aggregator, Inform.com, to assist in creating richer search functionality on their sites. Inform.com will scan news items and blogs related to articles on these sites and add links to articles from competitors' sites. The increasing popularity of Yahoo and Google's news aggregation and search engine services has prompted these news organizations to further blur the lines between publisher and search engine. This counters the trend in the publishing industry to generate and put out nuggets of information for quick and easy consumption, but it does follow trends set by Slate, Salon, and media blogs that depend on links to external sources for content. As noted in a NYT article by Kelly Dyer Fry, director of multimedia for Opubco Communications Group, which publishes the Oklahoman, “People aren’t just reading one story ... They’ll click deeper because of this, and I can load ads deeper into those pages. It really beefs up the site.” And that's the key--- online news organizations have a lot of content at their disposal, but will users be satisfied "drilling down" news items on their sites versus doing a search on Yahoo and Google?


The New York Observer has an kind of interesting essay about video sites such as YouTube; whereas most of the recent articles concerning these wildly popular sites have praised them, the Observer seeks more to bury them. And while the writer has a certain point that television moments used to be fleeting but now they're omnipresent (reminds me of a line on the Simpsons where Homer said, "Everything looks bad if you remember it"), what's he's really angry about isn't YouTube but is instead the betrayal of his own reactions. Who hasn't had a movie they loved as a kid not hold up to their adult expectations? Or who hasn't listened to a band they liked as a teenager or early adult or been horrified (for me it's Beat Happening; cringe)? If our estimation of something later in life is changed when we're reacquainted with it (whether it's books or movies or music), that's called maturity (or at the very least reappraisal). So if YouTube makes you confront something from twenty years ago, and you realize it wasn't what you thought it was, it's not really YouTube's fault. And who's to say you are (or were) any worse off for liking it way back when? As they say, ignorance is bliss...





